Your Baby's Brain: How Love, Connection, and Responsive Caregiving Support Development

Understanding the neuroscience of attachment, emotional security, and your baby's developing nervous system.

Illustration of a sleeping newborn with a glowing brain and glowing nerve connections around the head

The short version

Babies need connection

Babies cannot reliably feed, stay warm, or calm themselves without adults. Warm, responsive care is part of how they stay safe and how their brains and bodies develop.

Crying is communication

A cry is a signal. Babies cry a lot in the first weeks, and many crying spells have no single cause that anyone can find.

Calm grows slowly

The parts of the brain that help with calming and self-control keep maturing for years. A baby who cannot settle alone is not failing; the brain is developing as expected.

How we label the science here. Well-established means supported by many studies or standard physiology. Emerging means promising but incomplete, often from small studies or from animal research. Debated means scientists disagree. Most findings below are associations (two things tend to go together), not proof that one causes the other. Where a finding comes mainly from animal research, we say so.

Explore the brain: five key parts

Choose a part, or tap it on the drawing, to read what it does, what is known about it in babies and children, and how everyday caregiving connects to it. The drawing is a simplified, see-through side view. It is a schematic, not an anatomy atlas, and the real brain parts work together as networks rather than alone.

See-through side view of the brain A simplified drawing of the brain seen from the side as if the cortex were transparent, with five numbered parts: the amygdala, the prefrontal cortex at the front, the hippocampus, the hypothalamus, and the pituitary gland hanging below it. The front of the brain is on the left. 1 2 3 4 5

Amygdala Emerging

amygdala (a small almond-shaped cluster of nerve cells deep in the side of the brain)

What it does
It helps the brain judge how important or emotionally meaningful something is, including possible threats, and it takes part in learning from emotional experience and in stress responses. It is not simply a "fear center"; it works as one part of wider networks.
In babies and children
It is already active in infancy. A brain-imaging study of 80 children aged 3 months to 5 years (different children were scanned at each age) found that many of the amygdala's connections to sensory and deeper brain regions already looked like those of older children, while the shift in its connections with the front of the brain had not yet appeared by age 5. Researchers describe the amygdala and prefrontal cortex as developing together over a long period, which gives caregivers a long time to help.
Caregiving connection
Researchers think caregiving can shape how these circuits develop, but this is mainly a theory supported by animal work and by studies of severe adversity. We do not know of evidence that ordinary parenting stress or imperfect days change a child's amygdala.
Illustration of a baby's head from the side with the brain visible. Labels show the prefrontal cortex (developing), the hippocampus (memory), the amygdala (emotions), and the brainstem (basic functions).
Infant brain, side view. The same parts you can explore above, drawn on a baby's head. It is a simplified picture; each part works together with the others as part of networks. The labels inside the picture are in English.

The stress hormone chain (HPA axis)

Well-established The HPA axis (hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, the body's main hormonal stress system) is a normal, adaptive system that everyone has. It is not a sign that something is wrong.

The HPA axis, step by step A diagram of the stress hormone chain. The hypothalamus in the brain releases CRH, which tells the pituitary gland to release ACTH into the blood. ACTH travels to the adrenal glands on top of the kidneys, which release cortisol. Cortisol acts on the body and also signals back to the brain to turn the system down. 1 2 3 4 5
  1. Hypothalamus. When the brain detects a real or expected demand, it releases CRH (corticotropin-releasing hormone, a chemical messenger).
  2. Pituitary gland. CRH tells it to release ACTH (adrenocorticotropic hormone) into the blood.
  3. ACTH travels in the blood to the adrenal glands.
  4. Adrenal glands (small glands on top of the kidneys) release cortisol, which helps the body mobilize energy for the demand.
  5. Negative feedback. Cortisol also signals back to the brain to turn the system down once the demand has passed.
Illustration of the infant stress response. The hypothalamus releases CRH, the pituitary gland releases ACTH, and the adrenal glands above the kidneys release cortisol. A note says cortisol helps the body respond to stress and that supportive caregiving can help buffer and regulate this response.
The infant stress response (HPA axis). Hypothalamus, then pituitary gland, then adrenal glands. The picture's note that supportive caregiving can help buffer this response reflects an idea with limited and mixed human evidence, so read it as "may help". The labels inside the picture are in English.

What this means for babies Emerging

Babies' stress systems are working in the first year. In a review of 47 studies of infants aged 3 to 18 months, laboratory stressors such as brief separation were linked with only a small average rise in cortisol, and only the separation studies showed a consistent rise. Measurement methods varied widely. Scientists do not yet have a clear picture of how this changes across infancy.

Does caregiving change it? Emerging

Researchers think warm, responsive care can help calm a child's body as well as their feelings. Some studies link caregiving to babies' cortisol or heart measures. But a meta-analysis of parenting programs found no overall effect on child cortisol, and another found no clear overall link between early life stress and cortisol. The human evidence is small and inconsistent, and the trial that found a link studied families involved with child protective services, partly through correlation. So we say "may help buffer", not "lowers cortisol".

Cortisol is not the enemy. It follows a daily rhythm (this is general physiology) and a short rise in a stress hormone is part of healthy functioning. Whether a stress response is helpful or harmful depends on its context, how long and how intense it is, and the individual.

The body's autopilot (autonomic nervous system) and the vagus nerve

Well-established The autonomic nervous system (the body's automatic controls for heart rate, breathing, digestion, and more) has a sympathetic part, which generally prepares the body for action, and a parasympathetic part, which supports rest and recovery. They work together to keep the body in balance. That is a useful simplification, not an on-off switch. The newborn's autonomic system is still maturing, and a baby's heart-rate patterns reflect this.

The autonomic nervous system and the vagus nerve A simplified body outline. The brainstem at the base of the brain gives rise to the vagus nerve, which runs down through the neck and chest to the heart, the lungs, and the gut. Alongside the spine, sympathetic nerves also reach the heart, lungs, and gut. The sympathetic branch raises arousal; the parasympathetic branch, including the vagus nerve, supports calming and recovery. 1 2 3 4 5 6
  1. Brainstem (the base of the brain, where automatic functions are coordinated).
  2. Vagus nerve (the tenth cranial nerve, purple line): the main nerve of the parasympathetic system. It carries signals in both directions between the brainstem and organs, including the heart, lungs, and gut.
  3. Sympathetic nerves (orange dashed line, running alongside the spine) generally raise arousal.
  4. Lungs.
  5. Heart. Both branches affect heart rate.
  6. Gut (digestive tract).
Illustration of a baby's body showing the autonomic nervous system. The sympathetic branch (activation) increases heart rate, mobilizes energy, and prepares for action. The parasympathetic branch (rest and recovery) slows heart rate, supports digestion, promotes calm, and helps with sleep.
The autonomic nervous system in an infant. A simplified picture of the two branches. They work together rather than as an on-off switch. The labels inside the picture are in English.

Heart rhythms between parent and baby Emerging

In 12 studies of mothers and children (mostly beyond infancy), heart-related rhythms moved together to a modest degree during interaction. Larger reviews find this "synchrony" varies by age and context and is not simply good or bad. One study of at-risk infants found that babies' heart rhythm changed around moments of shared positive play with their mothers. Evidence is correlational and effects are modest.

Calming together

When you hold, rock, or talk softly to a baby, it often helps a still-immature system settle. This is called co-regulation (a caregiver helping a child's body and feelings settle). Babies cannot do this alone yet. In one study, babies from 5 to 18 months relied more on regulation shared with a caregiver as they grew, and children take on more of it themselves over the preschool years and beyond.

Photo-style illustration of a mother holding her newborn close. Notes list a calm voice, eye contact, gentle touch, and a steady heartbeat, and say that emotional connection helps regulate the baby's nervous system.
Mother and baby co-regulation. A calm voice, eye contact, gentle touch, and closeness can help a baby settle. The research on how parent and baby bodies influence each other is still emerging, so this shows ideas and ordinary comforts, not a guarantee. Any caregiver can do this, not only mothers. The labels inside the picture are in English.
Established science versus a popular theory. Well-established The anatomy and function of the vagus nerve above are standard physiology. Debated Polyvagal theory goes further, proposing separate "ventral" and "dorsal" vagal branches that produce social-engagement versus shutdown states. A number of physiologists argue that its main premises do not fit the evidence on anatomy and evolution, while its author defends it. Detailed vagal anatomy is reviewed elsewhere. We therefore do not present polyvagal ideas as fact, and we do not endorse claims about "toning" or "stimulating" a baby's vagus nerve.

Neuroplasticity: the brain changes with experience

Well-established Neuroplasticity (the brain's ability to change its connections in response to experience). Early in life the brain makes many more synapses (connections between nerve cells) than it will keep. Connections that are used and strengthened tend to be kept, while others are trimmed, a process called pruning. Much of the detail on pruning and sensitive periods comes from animal studies, and the human evidence on early adversity is mostly about severe deprivation.

Sensitive periods

Plasticity is especially high in early windows called sensitive periods. This is why early experience matters. But in humans these windows are graded and flexible, not doors that slam shut at a certain age, and outcomes after early difficulty are described as probabilities, not certainties.

The brain grows fastest early, and keeps changing

The brain develops fastest in the first two years, and development goes on at a slower pace afterwards. Genes and experiences all contribute, and parents do not "build" a baby's brain alone. The capacity to change continues through life, though it is usually greatest early.

Emerging Hopeful, and honest. In a randomized trial of children moved from institutions to foster families, those placed in foster care had better thinking, physical, and mental-health outcomes years later, with benefits linked to staying in stable, high-quality care. That shows change is possible after severe early adversity. It does not show that everyone can "heal completely", and the strongest evidence concerns extreme deprivation, not everyday stress or imperfect parenting. We also do not claim that any particular activity "rewires" the brain, and we do not repeat popular numbers such as "a million connections a second" because the research cited here does not support specific counts.

Your baby's development over time

Children develop at different speeds. The ages below come from the US CDC and American Academy of Pediatrics milestone checklists, which list skills that at least three out of four children are expected to show by that age. They are tools for noticing and talking with your child's doctor, not tests every child passes on schedule. Choose an age to read more.

Pregnancy: the senses start to listen

Illustration of fetal brain development in three stages. First trimester, weeks 1 to 12: the neural tube and early brain structures. Second trimester, weeks 13 to 27: rapid growth and organization of brain regions. Third trimester, weeks 28 to 40: accelerated brain growth and connectivity.
Fetal brain development by trimester. A simplified picture of how the brain grows before birth. This picture uses weeks 1 to 12, 13 to 27, and 28 to 40; elsewhere on this site we follow the ACOG trimester boundaries (1 to 13, 14 to 27, and 28 to birth), because sources divide the weeks slightly differently. The labels inside the picture are in English.
  • Sensory. Late in pregnancy a baby can hear. In a small imaging study of 9 pregnant women at 33 to 38 weeks, most fetuses showed auditory-brain activity when the mother sang. A review of 8 studies found 7 showed newborns had learned sounds presented before birth, but the studies were mostly low quality and used experimental sounds. This does not show that playing music to the belly helps. The studies do not give a reliable week for when hearing begins.
  • Attachment. Many parents begin to feel connected to their baby during pregnancy. Not feeling a strong connection yet is common. Studies find only a small to moderate link between feelings in pregnancy and later bonding, so it does not decide how bonding will go.

Ages are approximate and described by milestone checklists, not by exact onset studies. If you are worried about your child's development, ask your pediatrician; early support helps.

What is still uncertain

Limits of this evidence.

  • Much of the neuroscience of caregiving comes from animal studies and from studies of severe adversity. Evidence about ordinary family life is thinner.
  • Most findings are associations. Children also shape their parents' behavior, and shared genes and circumstances can look like parenting effects.
  • Many studies come from a limited range of countries, and families everywhere care for babies in many good ways.
  • The drawings here are simplified schematics. A professional medical illustrator and a pediatric neuroscientist should review them before wider use.
Psychoeducation, not medical advice. This page explains research in plain words. It cannot diagnose your baby or you, and it does not replace your doctor, midwife, or pediatrician. Most claims here are tied to a numbered reference at the bottom of the page; a few are standard textbook anatomy. Back to the baby brain overview

You are part of the environment, not the whole of it

Nothing on this page means a parent has to be perfect, or that a mother alone builds her baby's brain. Genes, health, family circumstances, and many things nobody chooses all shape development. Caregivers are an important part of that environment, and so is the support around them.

Looking after the person who looks after the baby is part of looking after the baby. When a parent is struggling, for example with depression, very broken sleep, or little help, caregiving can be a little harder on average (the link with depression is small). Many parents in those situations care warmly and well. One large study found the link between depression and sensitive parenting was largely explained by other circumstances in families' lives, which is one reason support matters. In one Australian study, support from a partner or family was linked with better parent-baby interaction in mothers who had depressive symptoms. Asking for help, resting, and getting treatment are not selfish. They are part of good care. More on this in Secure Attachment

Support for mothers after birth: Postpartum Support International

Postpartum Support International (PSI) offers free help for pregnancy and postpartum mental health, for mothers and for other parents. You do not need to be in crisis to reach out. Feeling overwhelmed, anxious, sad, or not like yourself after a baby is common and treatable, and you will always hear back from a person, not an AI program.

  • Call the PSI HelpLine: 1-800-944-4773 (press 1 for Spanish, 2 for English)
  • Text in English: text "Help" to 800-944-4773
  • Text in Spanish: 971-203-7773
  • App: download "Connect by PSI" in your app store

The HelpLine is free and confidential. You can leave a message any time, and calls and texts are returned every day, from 8 am to 11 pm Eastern time. It gives information, support, and local resources. It is not a crisis line and does not handle emergencies. About the HelpLine

In a crisis or emergency, reach out right now. The National Maternal Mental Health Hotline is free, available 24/7 in the United States, and you can call or text 1-833-852-6262. You can also call or text 988, text HOME to 741741, or call 911 if you or your baby are in immediate danger. PSI emergency information

References

All sources are peer-reviewed journal articles or professional policy statements published 2016 to 2026. Select a number above to jump to its reference, and a DOI to open the original article. APA 7th edition.

  1. Burkart, J. M., Cerrito, P., Natalucci, G., & van Schaik, C. P. (2025). Cooperative Breeding as a Likely Early Catalyst of Human Evolution. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews, 34(3), e70016. https://doi.org/10.1002/evan.70016 https://doi.org/10.1002/evan.70016 review (evolutionary anthropology)
  2. Hodel, A. S. (2018). Rapid infant prefrontal cortex development and sensitivity to early environmental experience. Developmental Review, 48, 113–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2018.02.003 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2018.02.003 narrative review (neuroimaging)
  3. Wolke, D., Bilgin, A., & Samara, M. (2017). Systematic review and meta-analysis: Fussing and crying durations and prevalence of colic in infants. The Journal of Pediatrics, 185, 55-61.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.02.020 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.02.020 meta-analysis
  4. Zeevenhooven, J., Browne, P. D., L'Hoir, M. P., de Weerth, C., & Benninga, M. A. (2018). Infant colic: mechanisms and management. Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 15(8), 479-496. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41575-018-0008-7 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41575-018-0008-7 narrative review
  5. Kolk, S. M., & Rakic, P. (2022). Development of prefrontal cortex. Neuropsychopharmacology, 47(1), 41-57. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-021-01137-9 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-021-01137-9 narrative review (human and animal)
  6. Šimić, G., Tkalčić, M., Vukić, V., Mulc, D., Španić, E., Šagud, M., Olucha-Bordonau, F. E., Vukšić, M., & R. Hof, P. (2021). Understanding Emotions: Origins and Roles of the Amygdala. Biomolecules, 11(6), 823. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11060823 https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11060823 narrative review · animal research
  7. Gabard-Durnam, L., O’Muircheartaigh, J., Dirks, H., Dean, D., Tottenham, N., & Deoni, S. (2018). Human amygdala functional network development: A cross-sectional study from 3 months to 5 years of age. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 34, 63-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2018.06.004 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2018.06.004 cross-sectional neuroimaging (resting-state fMRI)
  8. Tottenham, N., & Gabard-Durnam, L. J. (2017). The developing amygdala: a student of the world and a teacher of the cortex. Current Opinion in Psychology, 17, 55-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.06.012 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.06.012 narrative review (theoretical) · animal research
  9. Tottenham, N. (2020). Early Adversity and the Neotenous Human Brain. Biological Psychiatry, 87(4), 350-358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2019.06.018 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2019.06.018 narrative review
  10. Larsen, B., & Luna, B. (2018). Adolescence as a neurobiological critical period for the development of higher-order cognition. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 94, 179-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.09.005 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.09.005 narrative review
  11. Gómez, R. L., & Edgin, J. O. (2016). The extended trajectory of hippocampal development: Implications for early memory development and disorder. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 57-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2015.08.009 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2015.08.009 narrative review · animal research
  12. Luby, J. L., Belden, A., Harms, M. P., Tillman, R., & Barch, D. M. (2016). Preschool is a sensitive period for the influence of maternal support on the trajectory of hippocampal development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(20), 5742-5747. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1601443113 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1601443113 longitudinal cohort (neuroimaging)
  13. Bernier, A., Dégeilh, F., Leblanc, É., Daneault, V., Bailey, H. N., & Beauchamp, M. H. (2019). Mother–Infant Interaction and Child Brain Morphology: A Multidimensional Approach to Maternal Sensitivity. Infancy, 24(2), 120-138. https://doi.org/10.1111/infa.12270 https://doi.org/10.1111/infa.12270 longitudinal cohort (neuroimaging)
  14. Fong, H., Zheng, J., & Kurrasch, D. (2023). The structural and functional complexity of the integrative hypothalamus. Science, 382(6669), 388-394. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adh8488 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adh8488 narrative review
  15. Herman, J. P., McKlveen, J. M., Ghosal, S., Kopp, B., Wulsin, A., Makinson, R., Scheimann, J., & Myers, B. (2016). Regulation of the Hypothalamic‐Pituitary‐Adrenocortical Stress Response. Comprehensive Physiology, 6(2), 603-621. https://doi.org/10.1002/cphy.c150015 https://doi.org/10.1002/cphy.c150015 narrative review · animal research
  16. Sapolsky, R. M. (2021). Glucocorticoids, the evolution of the stress-response, and the primate predicament. Neurobiology of Stress, 14, 100320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ynstr.2021.100320 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ynstr.2021.100320 narrative review
  17. Puhakka, I. J. A., & Peltola, M. J. (2020). Salivary cortisol reactivity to psychological stressors in infancy: A meta-analysis. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 115, 104603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2020.104603 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2020.104603 meta-analysis (systematic review)
  18. Rattaz, V., Puglisi, N., Tissot, H., & Favez, N. (2022). Associations between parent–infant interactions, cortisol and vagal regulation in infants, and socioemotional outcomes: A systematic review. Infant Behavior and Development, 67, 101687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2022.101687 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2022.101687 systematic review
  19. Garnett, M., Bernard, K., Hoye, J., Zajac, L., & Dozier, M. (2020). Parental sensitivity mediates the sustained effect of Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-up on cortisol in middle childhood: A randomized clinical trial. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 121, 104809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2020.104809 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2020.104809 RCT with long-term follow-up
  20. Martins, R. C., Blumenberg, C., Tovo-Rodrigues, L., Gonzalez, A., & Murray, J. (2020). Effects of parenting interventions on child and caregiver cortisol levels: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Psychiatry, 20(1), 370. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-020-02777-9 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-020-02777-9 systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs
  21. Fogelman, N., & Canli, T. (2018). Early life stress and cortisol: A meta-analysis. Hormones and Behavior, 98, 63-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2017.12.014 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2017.12.014 meta-analysis
  22. Wehrwein, E. A., Orer, H. S., & Barman, S. M. (2016). Overview of the Anatomy, Physiology, and Pharmacology of the Autonomic Nervous System. Comprehensive Physiology, 6(3), 1239-1278. https://doi.org/10.1002/cphy.c150037 https://doi.org/10.1002/cphy.c150037 narrative review
  23. Patural, H., Pichot, V., Roche, F., & Giraud, A. (2023). Why, when and how to assess autonomic nervous system maturation in neonatal care units: A practical overview. Neurophysiologie Clinique, 53(2), 102855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucli.2023.102855 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucli.2023.102855 narrative review
  24. Breit, S., Kupferberg, A., Rogler, G., & Hasler, G. (2018). Vagus Nerve as Modulator of the Brain–Gut Axis in Psychiatric and Inflammatory Disorders. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 9, 44. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00044 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00044 narrative review
  25. Miller, J. G., Armstrong‐Carter, E., Balter, L., & Lorah, J. (2023). A meta‐analysis of mother–child synchrony in respiratory sinus arrhythmia and contextual risk. Developmental Psychobiology, 65(1), e22355. https://doi.org/10.1002/dev.22355 https://doi.org/10.1002/dev.22355 meta-analysis
  26. DePasquale, C. E. (2020). A systematic review of caregiver–child physiological synchrony across systems: Associations with behavior and child functioning. Development and Psychopathology, 32(5), 1754-1777. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954579420001236 https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954579420001236 systematic review
  27. Lavezzo, L., Bhadra, K., Ceravolo, L., Hüppi, P., Scilingo, E. P., Grandjean, D., Péron, J., Nardelli, M., & Filippa, M. (2026). On human synchrony: A systematic review of the origins of physiological and neural synchrony in parent–infant dyads (0–12 months). Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 185, 106622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2026.106622 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2026.106622 systematic review
  28. Abney, D. H., Sheinkopf, S. J., Mitsven, S. G., Seifer, R., Lester, B. M., Tronick, E. Z., & Messinger, D. S. (2026). Mutual positive engagement with mother is uniquely associated with increases in human infant heart rate variability. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 381(1959), 20260004. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2026.0004 https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2026.0004 longitudinal cohort (exploratory observational)
  29. Atkinson, N. H., Jean, A. D. L., & Stack, D. M. (2021). Emotion regulation from infancy to toddlerhood: Individual and group trajectories of full-term and very-low-birthweight preterm infants. Infancy, 26(4), 570-595. https://doi.org/10.1111/infa.12405 https://doi.org/10.1111/infa.12405 longitudinal observational cohort
  30. Hendry, A., & Holmboe, K. (2026). Parent-reported infant emotion regulation and executive functions predict preschool executive function skills. Developmental Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0002229 https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0002229 longitudinal cohort (parent report)
  31. Grossman, P. (2023). Fundamental challenges and likely refutations of the five basic premises of the polyvagal theory. Biological Psychology, 180, 108589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2023.108589 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2023.108589 narrative review (critical)
  32. Taylor, E. W., Wang, T., & Leite, C. A. C. (2022). An overview of the phylogeny of cardiorespiratory control in vertebrates with some reflections on the ‘Polyvagal Theory’. Biological Psychology, 172, 108382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2022.108382 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2022.108382 narrative review (comparative physiology)
  33. Porges, S. W. (2022). Polyvagal Theory: A Science of Safety. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 16, 871227. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2022.871227 https://doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2022.871227 narrative review (theory paper by the theory's author)
  34. Neuhuber, W. L., & Berthoud, H. R. (2022). Functional anatomy of the vagus system: How does the polyvagal theory comply? Biological Psychology, 174, 108425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2022.108425 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2022.108425 narrative review (anatomy; critical appraisal)
  35. Faust, T. E., Gunner, G., & Schafer, D. P. (2021). Mechanisms governing activity-dependent synaptic pruning in the developing mammalian CNS. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 22(11), 657-673. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41583-021-00507-y https://doi.org/10.1038/s41583-021-00507-y narrative review (mostly animal mechanisms)
  36. Reh, R. K., Dias, B. G., Nelson, C. A., Kaufer, D., Werker, J. F., Kolb, B., Levine, J. D., & Hensch, T. K. (2020). Critical period regulation across multiple timescales. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(38), 23242-23251. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1820836117 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1820836117 narrative review · animal research
  37. Nelson, C. A., & Gabard-Durnam, L. J. (2020). Early Adversity and Critical Periods: Neurodevelopmental Consequences of Violating the Expectable Environment. Trends in Neurosciences, 43(3), 133-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2020.01.002 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2020.01.002 narrative review
  38. Gilmore, J. H., Knickmeyer, R. C., & Gao, W. (2018). Imaging structural and functional brain development in early childhood. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 19(3), 123-137. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2018.1 https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2018.1 narrative review (imaging)
  39. Sampaio-Baptista, C., & Johansen-Berg, H. (2017). White Matter Plasticity in the Adult Brain. Neuron, 96(6), 1239-1251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2017.11.026 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2017.11.026 narrative review (human neuroimaging and animal)
  40. King, L. S., Guyon-Harris, K. L., Valadez, E. A., Radulescu, A., Fox, N. A., Nelson, C. A., Zeanah, C. H., & Humphreys, K. L. (2023). A Comprehensive Multilevel Analysis of the Bucharest Early Intervention Project: Causal Effects on Recovery From Early Severe Deprivation. American Journal of Psychiatry, 180(8), 573-583. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.20220672 https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.20220672 RCT (long-term follow-up)
  41. Vanderwert, R. E., Zeanah, C. H., Fox, N. A., & Nelson, C. A. (2016). Normalization of EEG activity among previously institutionalized children placed into foster care: A 12-year follow-up of the Bucharest Early Intervention Project. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 68-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2015.12.004 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2015.12.004 RCT follow-up (EEG)
  42. Zubler, J. M., Wiggins, L. D., Macias, M. M., Whitaker, T. M., Shaw, J. S., Squires, J. K., Pajek, J. A., Wolf, R. B., Slaughter, K. S., Broughton, A. S., Gerndt, K. L., Mlodoch, B. J., & Lipkin, P. H. (2022). Evidence-informed milestones for developmental surveillance tools. Pediatrics, 149(3), Article e2021052138. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2021-052138 https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2021-052138 policy statement (AAP-convened expert working group; literature-informed consensus; not a systematic review or RCT) · policy statement
  43. Goldberg, E., McKenzie, C. A., de Vrijer, B., Eagleson, R., & de Ribaupierre, S. (2020). Fetal response to a maternal internal auditory stimulus. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 52(1), 139-145. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.27033 https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.27033 cohort (fetal task fMRI)
  44. Movalled, K., Sani, A., Nikniaz, L., & Ghojazadeh, M. (2023). The impact of sound stimulations during pregnancy on fetal learning: A systematic review. BMC Pediatrics, 23(1), Article 183. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-023-03990-7 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-023-03990-7 systematic review
  45. Trombetta, T., Giordano, M., Santoniccolo, F., Vismara, L., Della Vedova, A. M., & Rollè, L. (2021). Pre-natal Attachment and Parent-To-Infant Attachment: A Systematic Review. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 620942. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.620942 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.620942 systematic review
  46. Jessen, S., Orf, M., & Obleser, J. (2025). Neural tracking of the maternal voice in the infant brain. The Journal of Neuroscience, 45(50), Article e0646252025. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0646-25.2025 https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.0646-25.2025 EEG experiment
  47. Schaal, B., Saxton, T. K., Loos, H., Soussignan, R., & Durand, K. (2020). Olfaction scaffolds the developing human from neonate to adolescent and beyond. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 375(1800), Article 20190261. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0261 https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0261 narrative review
  48. Donnelly, S., & Kidd, E. (2021). The longitudinal relationship between conversational turn-taking and vocabulary growth in early language development. Child Development, 92(2), 609-625. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13511 https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13511 longitudinal cohort (daylong audio recordings)
  49. Van Hulle, C. A., Moore, M. N., Lemery-Chalfant, K., Goldsmith, H. H., & Brooker, R. J. (2017). Infant stranger fear trajectories predict anxious behaviors and diurnal cortisol rhythm during childhood. Development and Psychopathology, 29(3), 1119-1130. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954579417000311 https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954579417000311 longitudinal cohort
  50. Mateus, V., Santos, A. C., Ganho-Ávila, A., Sobral, M., Osório, A., & Cruz, S. (2026). Neural correlates of joint attention in infants aged 8-24 months: A systematic review. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 78, Article 101678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2026.101678 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2026.101678 systematic review
  51. Gottwald, J. M., Achermann, S., Marciszko, C., Lindskog, M., & Gredebäck, G. (2016). An embodied account of early executive-function development. Psychological Science, 27(12), 1600-1610. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616667447 https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616667447 cross-sectional experimental study
  52. Feiman, R., Mody, S., Sanborn, S., & Carey, S. (2017). What Do You Mean, No? Toddlers’ Comprehension of Logical “No” and “Not”. Language Learning and Development, 13(4), 430-450. https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2017.1317253 https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2017.1317253 experimental comprehension study (3 experiments)
  53. Reuter, T., Feiman, R., & Snedeker, J. (2018). Getting to No: Pragmatic and Semantic Factors in Two- and Three-Year-Olds' Understanding of Negation. Child Development, 89(4), e364-e381. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12858 https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12858 experimental comprehension study (2 experiments)
  54. Van den Akker, A. L., Hoffenaar, P., & Overbeek, G. (2022). Temper Tantrums in Toddlers and Preschoolers: Longitudinal Associations with Adjustment Problems. Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, 43(7), 409-417. https://doi.org/10.1097/dbp.0000000000001071 https://doi.org/10.1097/dbp.0000000000001071 cross-sectional survey plus 1-year follow-up (subsample)
  55. Geeraerts, S. B., Endendijk, J. J., Deković, M., Huijding, J., Deater-Deckard, K., & Mesman, J. (2021). Inhibitory Control Across the Preschool Years: Developmental Changes and Associations with Parenting. Child Development, 92(1), 335-350. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13426 https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13426 longitudinal cohort (4 annual waves)
  56. Montroy, J. J., Bowles, R. P., Skibbe, L. E., McClelland, M. M., & Morrison, F. J. (2016). The development of self-regulation across early childhood. Developmental Psychology, 52(11), 1744-1762. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000159 https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000159 longitudinal cohort (3 samples)
  57. Stucke, N. J., & Doebel, S. (2024). Early childhood executive function predicts concurrent and later social and behavioral outcomes: A review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 150(10), 1178-1206. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000445 https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000445 meta-analysis
  58. Bernard, K., Nissim, G., Vaccaro, S., Harris, J. L., & Lindhiem, O. (2018). Association between maternal depression and maternal sensitivity from birth to 12 months: a meta-analysis. Attachment & Human Development, 20(6), 578–599. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616734.2018.1430839 https://doi.org/10.1080/14616734.2018.1430839 meta-analysis
  59. Padrutt, E. R., Stallworthy, I., DeJoseph, M., Wilson, S., & Berry, D. (2026). Maternal postnatal depression and sensitive parenting: Considering developmental timing with a causally informative approach. Developmental Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0002273 https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0002273 prospective longitudinal cohort (causal-inference modelling)
  60. MacMillan, K. K., Lewis, A. J., Watson, S. J., Bourke, D., & Galbally, M. (2021). Maternal social support, depression and emotional availability in early mother-infant interaction: Findings from a pregnancy cohort. Journal of Affective Disorders, 292, 757–765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2021.05.048 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2021.05.048 prospective pregnancy cohort

You don't have to wait until it's bad

These free US lines are for parents, partners, and anyone supporting them, during pregnancy and after.

Outside the US, contact your local emergency number or health service. If someone has confusion, hallucinations, or thoughts of harming themselves or the baby, call 911 or go to an emergency room.

Physical warning signs like chest pain, trouble breathing, a severe headache, or heavy bleeding during pregnancy or in the year after birth also need care right away. See urgent warning signs

Safety information in other languages: Español · Français · 中文 · Tiếng Việt · Italiano